Friday, July 02, 2004

Illegal Aliens Arrested? You can’t do that!

Washington Times story:

But several California legislators and immigration advocates criticized the arrests, saying they had caused panic in Southern California's Hispanic community. They accused the Border Patrol of racial profiling, with some Hispanic organizations issuing warnings to illegal aliens on what areas to avoid to keep from being arrested.

Ok so let me see they went in a arrested 420 illegal aliens in southern California, and the politicians there are mad? In the whole article there is not one reference of someone begin arrested and then found to be legally in country. They did not go into churches, schools, or even private homes to do this. I admire the Border Patrol they have a thankless job, one that we all count on being done everyday. Then we have these jack asses that we supposedly elect coming down on them! B.S. All this shows is that they are not working for the people. They are working for themselves. They were put there by these people. They told them ‘come on in and we will give you welfare, free medical and a care free life, all at the tax payers expense!’. These politicians are Liberals. They are only concerned with there power and the border patrol just arrested 420 people that, were and have most likely, already voted for them. Oh and the Hispanic organizations that were issuing warnings. There should be criminal charges filed on these jerk offs. They have interfering with a police action and supporting criminals. What I want to know is why, when groups like these do this kind of crap, doesn’t the Justice Department file charges on them! I know, political correctness. And down the tube we go…. See you at the bottom.

Thursday, July 01, 2004

Saddam is a liberal

News sites all over are talking about Saddam today. He called our President the real criminal. Yeah right. Sure. If we take a minute lets examine this statement just a little, and I am sure that as time and the trial goes on it will be made clear and true. What he is really saying here is that he would not be in this position if it were not for Bush. Just like Pres Clinton would not have been impeached if it were not for Ken Star. You see it is not his fault that he did not comply with 17 U.N. resolutions, or that he gassed his own people, or that he invaded a neighboring country. Nope cant be his fault. Just like almost every other liberal that I have heard talk on TV or the Radio, it is never there fault or the there ‘man’s’. Nope its always someone else’s fault. Here is the really sad part. I know there will be many in this very country that will believe him and agree with this piece of crap. You know when the time comes (and I think it will) for them to put this guy out of our misery, and they need to find an executioner I would be all to happy to volunteer my services.

I did not believe it myself

I got this at the The Washington Times

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, New York Democrat, told San Francisco residents this week.
At a fund-raiser for fellow Democrat Sen. Barbara Boxer of California, Mrs. Clinton told hundreds of Democratic supporters that they can expect to lose some of the Bush tax cuts if Democrats gain control of Washington next year, the Associated Press reported.
"Many of you are well enough off that ... the tax cuts may have helped you," Mrs. Clinton said. "We're saying that for America to get back on track, we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."

I had to go and look it up myself. What the hell was she thinking? Oh right she wasn’t. you need to go to the four right wing wackos web site. I really can not think of a better way to put how I feel about this myself!

65% of your land is ours

I first saw this on Fox News

“Residents of King County, Wash., will only be able to build on 10 percent of their land”

Looks like King County’s Ron ‘Tax to the Max’ Sims has found a great new issue to run on. Seems that what they want to do is let you go out and buy land, work your ass off for about 30 years to pay it off, and then tap you on your shoulder and remind you that 65% of that land is really theirs and you cant use it at all. Friends this is second great American land Rush (read grab). Only this time it is being run by environmentalists, (D)umbacrats, and generally liberals that live in places that these laws don’t affect. You see in Seattle there is no land per say. All there is there is buildings and paved roads. This law that they will pass has NO effect on them at all. Some have said that they want to pass this law so that they can go on a nice drive in the country on the weekend. I say that is most likely true. I really hope Ron takes this idea state wide, or that his opponent does for him, because eastern Washington would Love It (tongue firmly planted in cheek). I hope that the people that are affected by this sue Seattle, er King county. People when will this stop? Are there no more land owners rights?

Wednesday, June 30, 2004

Can I slap him YET?

On Little Green Footballs they had a link to (P)MSNBC

Just one quote for ya.
Brokaw: Prime minister, I’m surprised that you would make the connection between 9/11 and the war in Iraq. The 9/11 commission in America says there is no evidence of a collaborative relationship between Saddam Hussein and those terrorists of al-Qaida.

What I want to know is why does Brokaw still have a job? How does the network look anyone in the face and see “we don’t have no stinking bias” (blazing saddles style)? I would just love to slap this guy. For goodness flipping sakes, Tom you are in some dam cushy studio somewhere, this guy is there on the ground. He really DOES see what’s going on. The 911 commission (Joke) never did say that there was no connection at all between Saddam and the terrorists. Just not between Saddam and the horrible event that happened on 9/11. Oh and get over this dammed puppet government crap. Ok right now they are going to listen really hard to what we say and recommend, but like all things that will change in time, and they kind of need to because we are still providing the bulk of their security. Things like that done change overnight. One more thing Tom. Do you think that for once you could be on our side? The side of America?

Comments Welcome!

The trial of a madman

In the Tacoma News Tribune today:

Saddam faces charges. This is a positive step again in the right direction. I must also say that I really did not see any media bias on this article. Which is surprising to me, although the writer did not give any credit to the Bush administration, but no matter. I hope that the coming months will show the Iraqi people that they are indeed free. I do morn the lost of our men, but it was not with out a good cause. Bringing freedom to people like these is always a good cause.

Tuesday, June 29, 2004

Mr. Chirac needs to shut up

The telegraph has this story

Apparently our President said something nice about Turkey. And the French Idiot came unglued.

Stung by Mr Bush's call for the EU to give Turkey a firm date for accession, Mr Chirac responded: "He not only went too far but he has gone into a domain which is not his own.
"He has nothing to say on this subject. It is as if I were to tell the United States how it should conduct its relations with Mexico."
Yep that’s right He would never tell us how to manage our business at all (Iraq)? Oh yea, we do have a stake in that area of the world don’t we? As part of NATO and aren’t our troops on the border of Turkey? I think so!

They go on to say:
Mr Chirac's outburst reflects the unresolved tensions over Iraq and France's declining influence in the EU and Nato.

Well Duh. This is France we are talking about. I cant think of a reason to take them seriously anyway. Why are they even on the U.N. Security Council? They have what? Couple of nukes? Only one aircraft carrier, which I have heard is used as an example of what NOT to do. I wish Bush would tell Mr. Chirac to go get bent. That way he is not using a curse word and people will still know what he means. Although it might be a little over Mr. Chirac’s head.

Your comments are welcome!!!

Monday, June 28, 2004

Fingerprints in Pierce County

I read this article in the Tacoma News Tribune today

Seems that what they want is Tacoma PD to use a system, that although useful, is not compatible with the rest of the state, and I would bet, not compatible with the FBI system. There rational? The company that created the software for Pierce county is local company and if Tacoma PD does not also use it that hundreds could loose their jobs. This is just stupid. Its kind of like the argument that they should not have built cars because the buggy and whip makers would be out of a job. As always I will try to offer a solution to the problem, so here it is. If the company that makes the current system in Pierce county wants to stay alive they need to make there product compatible. This is usually done by talking to the other company to get information on how they communicate and store data. You might be surprised to find that a lot of companies will share this information, sometimes with a small cost. Also if they are really desperate they can reverse engineer the communications link and do it that way. But to ask Tacoma PD to stick with or buy a system that is not compatible with state is just dumb.